Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Keys to Hiring the Right People

Excerpts from Hiring The Best by Martin Yates, C.P.C.

Just as people grow and change during their careers, so do companies. The needs of companies change as they pass through different stages of growth, and your ability to make successful hires at the higher levels can depend on your being able to identify the dislocations between the corporate growth-cycle position of both your company and your candidates.

Depending on their success, companies pass through five stages of growth: they are start-up, growth, maturity, atrophy and turnaround. A company's nature and its manpower needs at the more senior levels can change quite dramatically at each stage.

Start -up


The start-up company can begin on a kitchen table or in a garage, comprising just its founders and employees. The founders struggle with an idea, a service, or a product, its development, and its initial "bringing to market." From this point the company may continue to struggle for survival and stay with few or no employees, or it may begin to grow. At this stage, any employee may be in direct daily contact with the company owner; there is little in the way of systems & procedures; and the mission is relatively simple: "Pay the phone bills and the rent to stay in business while we find a market." This start-up phase can rapidly accelerate into the growth phase with the influx of capital.

Growth

The company finds its market (or sometimes just its funding), and begins to grow. The focus is on gaining customers and then market share, rather than just struggling to keep the doors open. Staff is hired in response to overload rather than planning. At least in the early days the founders are still involved in every aspect of the business, and communication is largely verbal. The main focus of a growth company is the marketing/sales process to enhance that growth. Many growth companies never grow beyond  a size that the founders can manage personally. An entrepreneur's inability to let go of even the tiniest details is seen as the Achilles' heel of many growth companies; they stall out because the founder is the only individual with any authority, overseeing perhaps seventy-five personal assistants, and there is no management structure.

The Mature Company

The third phase of growth comes when the company is stable and at the top of its stride. All communication necessarily becomes formal, with more emphasis on written communication. More and stricter systems and procedures are implemented; the Human Resources department moves into ascendancy; there is less room for individual creativity; the company is unlikely to be alone in its market; and that market may even be reaching the saturation point. The aggressive investments in marketing/sales that typify growth-cycle companies begin to be replaced by a greater focus on operations. While in earlier stages a company worries more about getting the job done and making sales. The mature company, finding it more difficult to increase sales & profit margins by increasing volume, begins to look more seriously at cost containment as a viable profit generator. Automation, downsizing, outsourcing and offshoring of jobs and processes come to the fore.

The companies larger size necessitates more levels of management. It becomes possible for careers to flourish simply by avoiding mistakes, and as the mature company relies more on committees than on individual initiative, such avoidance becomes easier. Risk taking changes, partly because now any risk is so much greater and partly because of the increasing "analysis paralysis" practiced by ever-growing numbers of managers and administrators. The once vibrant concern has become a bureaucracy, sluggish with overhead. It behaves like an institution, swelled with self importance, blind to maladies that it believes to be strengths. The mature company under all these pressures eventually begins to stagnate.

Atrophy

Here begins the decay stage of the corporate life cycle. Early signs are an acceptance of the same old profit margins and standards; excuses that the market, the economy, or the numbers of competitors now flooding the field make it impossible for anyone to make a living; and complaints about the lack of competent employees. The focus is on cost cutting. The finger of blame points outward, and no one sees where the other three digits on the hand are pointing.

Turnaround

The fifth stage is recognition of atrophy and sustained, concerted action to achieve turnaround. Consultants are everywhere, turnaround experts are brought on board, and the focus becomes one of returning to the vibrancy of the growth company.

Hiring and the Life-Cycle Challenge
At the higher levels, the suitability of a candidate for a position depends in part on the corporate life cycle history of the candidate, and, in part, on the personality of that candidate. A person from one phase of the cycle may, or may not be appropriate for a company in another phase.

Start-ups will frequently benefit most from executives who have seen their prior employers at least through the growth phase and possibly into calm waters of organization and maturity. Growth-stage companies benefit from a combination of executives with experience in that stage and from those who have seen the successful transition into maturity.

Companies in the fourth and fifth stage need fresh blood, executives that can raise the dead. These people come mostly from start-up and growth companies, yet sometimes they and the turnaround experts (who often have experiences at the different stages) just don't fit in the mature and wilting company. The bureaucracy drives them crazy, and they upset everyone else on the train. Of course, that is really why they are there in the first place.

Finding someone who has successfully operated in all these phases is rare indeed, as each demands different approaches and skills.

Now, what does all this mean? It means that in the selection of important positions, you need to have an awareness of where your company stands in its evolutionary cycle, and where it is headed:

  • When you are in start-up mode or in the midst of strong growth, you are wise to look for someone who comes from a similar cultural environment ... unless, of course, your strong growth is tilting you toward the need for order and organization that typifies the mature company.
  • If your company is approaching transition, you could benefit from someone grounded in the next phase of the corporate life cycle.
  • If your company is in a state of atrophy or turnaround, you will want people from the earlier stages of growth and vibrant maturity to re-energize your corporate situation.
None of this means you should reject otherwise qualified candidates out of hand. But it does mean that when you know where your company stands on the continuum, and therefore the type of management it needs, you are likely to make more productive hires.

Monday, March 5, 2012

9 Reasons for Hiring The Wrong Person

Excerpt from Hiring The Best by Martin Yate, C.P.C.

In almost every instance of making a bad hire, the cause can be traced to one of the following reasons:

  • Poor analysis of job functions ... leading to recruitment of the wrong people.
  • Misguided recruitment strategies ... leading to an inadequate pool of talent.
  • Poor analysis of the necessary skill sets & behaviors ... leading to inappropriate selection criteria
  • Inadequate initial screening ... leading to wasted time & the wrong candidates on the short list.
  • Inadequate interviewing techniques ... resulting in less access to the facts.
  • Inadequate questioning techniques ... allowing candidates to commit "snow jobs."
  • Poor utilization of "second opinions" ... compounding all of the above errors.
  • Overselling of company & career/money expectations ... leading to frustrated & unmotivated staff.
  • Not checking references ... leading to troublemakers (and worse) sneaking onto your payroll & damaging your professional reputation.

View Pat Alacqua's profile on LinkedIn

Monday, January 23, 2012

Talk To Your Sales People - How To Get Started

This is the time of year when Revenue Projections have been completed and your sales staff is turned loose to reach those stretch goals.

The following is a great approach to start dialogue and connect with staff, support them and keep them focused on the right things to Make Sales Happen!

Ask them what they would like to talk about that would have the highest impact on their
  1. Paycheck
  2. Performance This Year
  3. Career
As they are considering what they want to talk about, ask "them" to keep the following THREE C's in mind:
  1. Concentrate in Silence - Disciplined Thinking
  2. Choice - from all the options ... what will and won't they do.
  3. Commitment .... what will they publicly commit to .... affirmation
Listen for how you can support their success......listen for obstacles before them that they will need your help with. Help them be successful and new revenue projections won't feel like such a stretch!!

Friday, January 20, 2012

Transition Leadership - Align Expectations

Excerpt from Your Next Move by Michael D. Watkins

The following 5 Areas of Conversation that transitioning leaders should have with their bosses along with guiding questions that can help both sides come to some agreement about organizational-change challenge the new leader has been brought in to tackle.

The Style Conversation

  • How can we best work together?
  • How do you prefer me to communicate with you?
  • What level of detail do you want concerning my organization or unit and the issues I'm confronting?
  • How do you prefer to make decisions?
The Situation Conversation
  • How do you see the STARS situation in my organization as a whole? In important subcomponents? (STARS is an acronym for 5 common situations leaders may find themselves moving into .... Startup, Turnaround, Accelerated Growth, Realignment - drifting into difficulty, Sustaining Success - successful but confronting maturity).
  • On what do you base these assessments?
  • What's your level of certainty?
The Expectations Conversation
  • What am I expected to accomplish, and in what time frame?
  • What would constitute "early wins" for you?
  • What outcomes do I most need to avoid?
The Resources Conversation
  • What financial and other resources are available to me?
  • What scope do I have to make changes in my team?
  • To what extent will you visibly support me in making the case for change?
The Course Adjustment Conversation - this typically should begin not later than the ninety-day mark
  • How are things going so far?
  • What am I doing well?
  • Do you have areas of concern?

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Take on a Partner or Go It on Your Own?

Excerpt from Effortless Entrepreneur by Nick Friedman & Omar Soliman

Should You Take On a Partner?


When you consider taking on a partner, ask yourself, "Can I do it on my own?" Have a clear picture of where you want to take your business, how you'll get there and how quickly you need to arrive. If you can realize that picture by simply hiring people to help, it may be okay to ride solo. However, you need to consider all aspects of doing it alone, including the pitfalls of having only employees with no vested interest in the company's success.

Ask yourself, "Even if I can do it myself, do I want to?" There is both an emotional and a practical aspect to consider. They often aren't aligned. The emotional one requires you to look inside to determine what's really important. Even if you achieve greatness by yourself, would you like to share the triumphs with a teammate who has a similar vested interest. Emotionally you may choose a friend or relative, since it feels comfortable. But if that person's values, vision and culture aren't aligned with yours from a business perspective, any adversity could cause a huge rift, both business and personal.

On the practical side, even if you can do it on your own, would you prefer not having to do 100 percent of the work? Some people don't mind sharing a portion of the company to keep from doing it all. The question then becomes, "How much do I share and do I know what this person will contribute?" When you identify your strengths, weaknesses, and unique abilities, try to partner with someone who can balance your weaknesses and share the load evenly.

Before you agree to work with a partner, ask yourself these questions and think hard about your answers:

  • Can I share the spotlight or be under a microscope?
  • Am I willing to share the decision-making power?
  • Am I able to lead by myself?
  • Am I willing to respect the boundaries and needs of someone with ownership in the company?
  • Am I willing to take a minority stake in the company or do I need a majority?
  • What are my strengths? What do I not like to do?
  • What are my ultimate goals for this business?
  • Am I able to bear the entire weight of the business on my shoulders?
Any venture you embark on involves risk from unknown variables that come with a new business. Adding a partner increases those unknown risks. A person can get lazy and not uphold his end. Neither of you is wholly accountable for what could go wrong, so partnering creates a false sense of security that you don't have when you start solo. If you and your partner don't work as hard as possible together to launch the business, it can fizzle and die. Unless who is accountable for what is spelled out in your partnership agreement, there is no captain to steer the ship of the business. Fingers pointed at each other do no good. You and your partner must both be fully committed and ready to do whatever it takes to succeed.

Don't jump into bed with the first person who gets excited about your business plan or who has cash to invest. Spend time together to assess the kind of personality you'd be working with. Does anything annoy you? If so, will it only get worse under pressure? Make sure it's someone who can be a team player and complement what you bring to the company. Check references. Ask why this person wants to be your partner. The wrong partner can sink your dream fast. The right one can create a harmonious team, making the game much more enjoyable, rewarding and productive. 

View Pat  Alacqua's profile on LinkedIn

Systemize Your Business for the Long Haul

Excerpt from Effortless Entrepreneur by Nick Friedman & Omar Soliman

Use a Franchise Model Even if You Don't Franchise!


Following a franchise model is an essential step for every business owner, whether you plan to franchise your business or not. The best way for any entrepreneur to make the final jump from working IN the business to working ON it is to organize it and set up systems as if you plan to franchise it.

This doesn't mean you will franchise your business. Franchising is great for some businesses but doesn't make sense for many others. Either way, going through the process of making it franchisable is the best way  to create systems that allow you to step outside the day-to-day operations of your business and deal with issues you'd rather focus on, without affecting productivity or profitability.

Having systems in place increases the value of your business and enables you to be replaceable, which adds to the appeal if you choose to sell it down the road.

Building systems for your business builds the value of your business!!


View Pat  Alacqua's profile on LinkedIn

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Execution - The Discipline of Getting Things Done

Excerpt from Execution-The Discipline of Getting Things Done by Larry Bossidy & Ram Charan

Organization's don't execute unless the right people, individually & collectively, focus on the right details at the right time. For any leader, moving from the concept to the critical details is a long journey. You have to review a wide array of facts and ideas, permutations and combinations of which can approach infinity. You have to discuss what risks to take and where. You have to thread through these details, selecting those that count. You have to assign them to the people who matter, and make sure which key ones must synchronize their work.

Such decision making requires knowledge of the business and the external environment. It requires the ability to make fine judgements about people --- their capabilities, their reliability, their strengths and their weaknesses. It requires intense focus and incisive thinking. It requires superb skills in conducting candid, realistic dialogue.

Every great leader has had an instinct for execution. he or she has said, in effect, "Unless I can make this plan happen, it's not going to matter." But the selection, training and development of leaders doesn't focus on this reality. A high proportion of those who actually rise to the top of a business organization have made their mark --- their personal "brand" ---- as high-level thinkers. They are the kind of people who get caught up in the intellectual excitement of each new big idea that comes out and adopt it with enthusiasm. They are articulate conceptualizers, very good at grasping strategies and explaining them. This, they know, is what it takes to get ahead. They aren't interested in the "how" of getting things done; that's for somebody else to think about.

Judging a person's intelligence is easy for people who hire and promote others: it's harder to research a person's track record and gauge their know-how about getting things done, particularly when the performance is the result of many people working together. But the intelligent, articulate conceptualizers don't necessarily understand how to execute. Many don't realize what needs to be done to convert a vision into specific tasks, because their high level thinking is too broad. They don't follow through and get things done; the details bore them. They don't crystalize thought or anticipate roadblocks. They don't know how to pick people for their organizations who can execute. Their lack of engagement deprives them of the sound judgement about people that comes only through practice.

Leadership without the discipline of execution is incomplete and ineffective. Without the ability to execute, all other attributes of leadership become hollow.


View Pat  Alacqua's profile on LinkedIn